February 26, 2024: Article on the anticyclotomic Iwasawa theory of newforms at Eisenstein primes of semistable reduction

Why this matters. Iwasawa theory studies arithmetic invariants of an elliptic curve simultaneously along an infinite tower of number fields, which often reveals structure invisible at a single level. Its Main Conjecture predicts that an analytic object (built from a pp-adic LL-function) and an algebraic one (built from Galois cohomology) coincide. Establishing it has strong consequences: as the examples below show, it yields a pp-converse theorem, new cases of the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture, and improved proportions towards Goldfeld’s conjecture on the distribution of ranks in families. The new case here is that we work at Eisenstein primes, where the mod-pp Galois representation is reducible and the standard tools fail.

Let E/𝐐E/\mathbf{Q} be an elliptic curve of analytic rank 00 or 11 such that the mod-pp Galois representation ρp:G𝐐Aut(E[p](𝐐¯))\rho_p\colon G_\mathbf{Q}\to \operatorname{Aut}(E[p](\overline{\mathbf{Q}})) is reducible (“Eisenstein prime”). In our recent preprint “On the anticyclotomic Iwasawa theory of newforms at Eisenstein primes of semistable reduction” with Mulun Yin (University of California Santa Barbara), we prove (a) the Iwasawa Main Conjecture and Perrin-Riou’s Heegner point Main Conjecture over a Heegner field in which the odd prime pp of good or bad multiplicative reduction is split, and, as applications, (b) a pp-converse theorem (also for modular abelian varieties) and (c) the pp-part of strong BSD if p>2p > 2 has good reduction.

Here are the elliptic curves EE over 𝐐\mathbf{Q} in the LMFDB with E(𝐐)tors𝐙/pE(\mathbf{Q})_\mathrm{tors}\cong\mathbf{Z}/p, rank 00 or 11, and pp a prime of good reduction: p=3p=3, p=5p=5, and p=7p = 7.

As an application of (b), we obtain better proportions for the Goldfeld conjecture (50%50\,\% of the quadratic twists have rank 00 and 50%50\,\% have rank 11) for families of elliptic curves having a 33-isogeny where 33 is a prime of good or bad multiplicative reduction. This follows from a combination with results of Ari Shnidman et al. on the average 33-Selmer rank.

Let us now show that, even though our results on the pp-part of strong BSD are for elliptic curves only (the reason is that [Jetchev–Skinner–Wan] for ρp\rho_p irreducible work over imaginary quadratic fields that do not satisfy the Heegner condition), we can nevertheless use them to treat many more cases for modular abelian varieties with the article “Complete verification of strong BSD for many modular abelian surfaces over 𝐐\mathbf{Q} with Michael Stoll:

Consider the genus 22 curve X:y2=5x6+10x513x430x3+9x2+20x8X\colon y^2 = 5x^6 + 10x^5 - 13x^4 - 30x^3 + 9x^2 + 20x - 8 with absolutely simple semistable RM Jacobian JJ of squarefree level 5135 \cdot 13 and rank 00 associated to the newform 65.2.a.c. Note that this curve is not covered by op. cit. The algorithms from op. cit. prove the prime-to-33 part of strong BSD for J/𝐐J/\mathbf{Q} with #Ш(J/𝐐)an=2\#\mathrm{Ш}(J/\mathbf{Q})_\mathrm{an}= 2. Our results allow us to also prove the 33-part: Let the good ordinary prime 33 split as 𝔭𝔭\mathfrak{p}\mathfrak{p}' in 𝐙[f]=𝐙[3]\mathbf{Z}[f]=\mathbf{Z}[\sqrt{3}] such that ρ𝔭\rho_\mathfrak{p} is irreducible and ρ𝔭\rho_{\mathfrak{p}'} is reducible with a trivial 11-dimensional subrepresentation coming from the 33-torsion. The results and algorithms of op. cit. prove that the Heegner index IKI_K for DK=131D_K = -131 (so 33 is split in 𝒪K\mathcal{O}_K) equals 𝔭\mathfrak{p}' times some ideal lying above 22, and that the Tamagawa product considered as an ideal in 𝐙[f]\mathbf{Z}[f] equals 𝔭\mathfrak{p}'. Hence [loc. cit., Theorem 5.2.2] proves that Ш(J/𝐐)[𝔭]=0\mathrm{Ш}(J/\mathbf{Q})[\mathfrak{p}] = 0. Our IMC (a) shows that v𝔭(#Ш(J/K)[𝔭])=2v𝔭(IK)2v𝔭(Tam(J/𝐐))=22=0v_{\mathfrak{p}'}(\#\mathrm{Ш}(J/K)[\mathfrak{p}'^\infty]) = 2v_{\mathfrak{p}'}(I_K) - 2v_{\mathfrak{p}'}(\operatorname{Tam}(J/\mathbf{Q})) = 2 - 2 = 0. Since 𝔭2\mathfrak{p}' \nmid 2, we have Ш(J/K)[𝔭]Ш(J/𝐐)[𝔭]Ш(JK/𝐐)[𝔭]\mathrm{Ш}(J/K)[\mathfrak{p}'] \simeq\mathrm{Ш}(J/\mathbf{Q})[\mathfrak{p}'] \oplus \mathrm{Ш}(J^K/\mathbf{Q})[\mathfrak{p}'], hence we get Ш(J/𝐐)[𝔭]=0\mathrm{Ш}(J/\mathbf{Q})[\mathfrak{p}'] = 0, so strong BSD holds for J/𝐐J/\mathbf{Q} with Ш(J/𝐐)𝐙/2\mathrm{Ш}(J/\mathbf{Q}) \cong\mathbf{Z}/2.